Fully back in, what I like to call, MCQ-land now - the title of the entry is actually part of Q51, Advanced Evidence questions in the big MCQ book. I actually got that one right! (It's apparently the name of a film that proves very popular).
Ok so as for the All-Star game: (IRAC analysis)
Issue = Should I have bet on the National League winning?
Rule = Never bet on the National League winning (they haven't won in 10 years)
(Exception = national league are due for a win!)
Analysis = WE WAS ROBBED!! Bases loaded, bottom of the 9th! Reyes on form! If only they had left on Brad Penny and then had Saito closing, the bet would have been won!! Ugh
Conclusion = despite my mate comparing me to Krusty from Simpsons betting against the Globetrotters, and all else, the bet was justified under the facts and should have been won - the National League erred in their decision!
In other matters - received through the post today a 'new and updated' Conviser mini review, a huge CA outline, and CD's with June's lectures of Evidence, Civ Pro and Agency. As much as this seems very nice I am slightly lacking on time seeing as the exam is less than 2 weeks away so haven't really got the time to sit down and listen to, in total, 15 hours of lectures! Any suggestions as to whether it's worth listening to them? Or is it worth just checking they havent changed since the January lectures i already listened to?
_____________________________________________
MCQ's taken today - Evidence Adv (15/31)
Evidence Released MCQ's (27/34)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment